<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Tweet or not to Tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naperdesign.com/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naperdesign.com/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/</link>
	<description>We design and develop for Naperville, Chicago, and The World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://naperdesign.com/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naperdesign.com/?p=219#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Joseph&lt;/strong&gt;- I agree, I get highly annoyed with the people I&#039;m following that spam everyone with links to their site.  And yes they are short lived, but it is a realistic approach to generating a little more traffic.  At higher than 1.5 million ranking on Alexa, 1-3 more people visiting a day can mean a full percentage point in.  It has also been suggested that even these hidden and stacked inbound links can be seen as beneficial by some search engines.(I take no stance on that one, there are enough people arguing over it.) Regardless of if it&#039;s true or not, It can&#039;t hurt.

&lt;strong&gt;Big Guy&lt;/strong&gt;
Yes, it&#039;s big now, but so was myspace a year ago.  FB is hanging on to its highs mainly from its refusal to sell.  I personally feel that Twitter will not have leaders with the desire of protecting their creation like FB did... ie, facebooks refusal to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joseph</strong>- I agree, I get highly annoyed with the people I&#8217;m following that spam everyone with links to their site.  And yes they are short lived, but it is a realistic approach to generating a little more traffic.  At higher than 1.5 million ranking on Alexa, 1-3 more people visiting a day can mean a full percentage point in.  It has also been suggested that even these hidden and stacked inbound links can be seen as beneficial by some search engines.(I take no stance on that one, there are enough people arguing over it.) Regardless of if it&#8217;s true or not, It can&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<p><strong>Big Guy</strong><br />
Yes, it&#8217;s big now, but so was myspace a year ago.  FB is hanging on to its highs mainly from its refusal to sell.  I personally feel that Twitter will not have leaders with the desire of protecting their creation like FB did&#8230; ie, facebooks refusal to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Guy</title>
		<link>http://naperdesign.com/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naperdesign.com/?p=219#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Nice article.  I just don&#039;t get why you seem to be coming down on Twitter.  With every ten minutes on CNN and FOX News being some story from a Tweet, isn&#039;t it here to stay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.  I just don&#8217;t get why you seem to be coming down on Twitter.  With every ten minutes on CNN and FOX News being some story from a Tweet, isn&#8217;t it here to stay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://naperdesign.com/to-tweet-or-not-to-tweet/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 03:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naperdesign.com/?p=219#comment-15</guid>
		<description>So repeating my url like everyone else really won&#039;t help?  Why waste your time if all it&#039;s doing is making a quick link that fades after a few hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So repeating my url like everyone else really won&#8217;t help?  Why waste your time if all it&#8217;s doing is making a quick link that fades after a few hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.543 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-21 15:47:49 -->

